Gorgonzola. You
eat it alone whether you
start alone or not.
7 years ago
So Big is a wonderful novel that transported me to Chicago and its hinterlands at the end of the 19th and dawn of the 20th centuries. It was a good time to read a Chicago novel because we've visited there three times in the past year to see family and friends. I feel like I "got Chicago" more from multiple exposures, and having read this novel, I feel like I "get Chicago" even more. It's always hard as a reader to know how a book was received when it was first published, but it strikes me that this story would have felt very "of the moment" to those reading it in the '20s. In a way, it's an interpretation of how people came to lead their lives then based on how much Chicago was changing in the previous 40 years. New money transformed some people's lives and created vast gaps between the rich and the poor. Cultures that had persisted through immigration because of geographic community boundaries in the new world were starting to morph and break down through new tools of transportation and connection. The more things change, the more they stay the same. I fear that this review makes this novel sound like sociology, but it's really not. It's just a good novel placed in its moment in history.
This book got lots of press when it came out, and I finally managed to get to it on my reading list and pick up a copy from the library. It's a very interesting read in the vain of good business bestsellers with a tinge of self help. Starting with research about how introverts and extroverts differ (chief takeaway - introverts are more sensitive to stimuli), she eventually touches on what you should do as a manager, spouse or parent of an introvert if you're an extrovert. She makes compelling arguments that the world is tilted in favor of extroverted traits and that "shy" is a bad word. She argues for making space for individual processing of ideas. Split the tables apart in classrooms. Let people work alone to generate ideas and then submit them. This form of crowdsourcing is kinder to the introvert's pace of processing, but more importantly, it empirically produces more good ideas than group brainstorming.
With the Netflix television show being discussed at every gathering of the late summer and NPR fawning over it, I heard that the book on which the show was based was really very good. This memoir is flat out fantastic. An unlikely prisoner, Kerman describes her experience over a year in primarily a minimum security prison with some additional time at different facilities. She has no idea what to expect, living among women who are largely of a different class from her. What she discovers horrifies and heartens her and her readers. I don't want to give away too much more. If I have a quibble, it's that she sometimes stops short of describing why certain aspects of prison life were terrible, leaving the reader to fill in the blanks. A friend who has read the book said she turned off the TV show after five minutes because it's "too raw". Perhaps Piper was saving her dear readers by being oblique.
I enjoyed this memoir/collection of essays. Having listened to virtually every episode of Maron's WTF podcast and having watched his special (Thinky Pain) while reading the book, I found that the material wasn't particularly new. I enjoyed it anyway. Maron has worked hard to overcome a lot of demons, and he's really honest about the ways that he still hasn't. He's not for everyone, but I find myself at home in his audience.
I got to this book through a review of Jonathan Dee's latest novel (A Thousand Pardons). Given that this one had been a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize for Fiction and that it would be easier to get at the library because it's a few years old, I decided to read this one first. It's an engrossing novel whose narrative leaps forward in time from a couple's wedding to their small kids years to their teenager years to their grown children years. As time goes on, the kids themselves get about as much focus as the parents. In the end, it was rather unsatisfying for reasons of plot that I can barely describe without spoiling the novel. So I won't. It was a really ok beach read. And you know what I mean by "really ok".
I hate Douglas Rushkoff. I'd never heard of him before hearing about this book on Marc Maron's podcast, but I hate him. There was a sign outside my sister's high school that said "Much good work is lost for the lack of a little more." Douglas Rushkof never saw that sign. He is quite brilliant at cultural observation and synthesis. He can name what's happening in a way that I have not seen other people do. The problem is that in this book he just proceeds to name what's happening over and over again in multiple ways ad infinitum without ever getting to the "so what?" questions; without ever getting to what I as a person might do about the phenomenon he labels present shock. It's relentless, this book, and then it pays off almost not at all. He does coin the word "digiphrenia" to refer to when a person is physically in one place but mentally and emotionally is elsewhere thanks to a digital connection to that other place. His example of a young woman at one party texting and facebooking the whole time to figure out what better party she should be at crystallizes the phenomenon beautifully. Beyond that, he never gets to a worthwhile point despite all of his pointed observation and analysis. Grrrrrr.
Although it's somewhat off-topic for this blog, I just wanted to publicly notice a certain kind of conversation that goes on these days. Perhaps you had it with friends or family over the holidays. The conversation is called Smart People Talking About Good Television. David Broncoccio might amend that to be "About TV Worth Watching". I may not be the first to have named this conversation, but if this is the first time you've encountered a name for it, you're probably saying "Oh yeah. I've had that conversation."| Nice faces, boys. |